LanOptics Raising Stake In EZChip - A Bullish Sign
LanOptics announced last week that it would increase its stake in its subsidiary EZchip Technologies to 78% from 60%. This is another step towards the acquisition in full of EZchip by LanOptics, as previously agreed by its various shareholders back in 2003. What is actually happening is that EZchip investors are exchanging their shares for those of its parent.
EZchip, which develops and manufactures advanced network processors that are said to represent the high-end of these technologies, is LanOptic’s sole asset and it may well be that the stock swap is a technical transaction only, in order to, as LanOptics put it, “rationalize corporate structure by unifying the shareholdings in the two companies.” On the other hand, many people will interpret this move as a sign of an imminent breakthrough business-wise, and that they would therefore be better off with LanOptic’s marketable shares rather than the non-marketable ones of EZchip.
LanOptics is classic example of the chasm between Wall Street and Main Street that I am constantly referring to. In LanOptics’ case one of those involved is leading technology guru George Gilder. He believes in the product and the company, which he recommends at every opportunity. The trouble is that he has been waxing enthusiastic since the turn of the century, and the breakthrough has yet to come.
LanOptics slipped from $10 at the beginning of 2002 to $4 a year later. By the beginning of 2004 it had rallied to $11, and then fell to $5 in July, only to climb back up to $15 by the end of the year. By November 2005 it was back down at $5, rising to $10 in May 2006, and then slipping again to $7, following which it rallied once more to its current price ($14.26 at the close of trading yesterday).
A right old yo yo on Wall Street combined with steady progress on Main Street. This is what classics are made of.
LNOP 3-yr chart:
Published originally by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes.co.il
© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2006. Republished on Seeking Alpha with full permission.
- How Ciena Detonated the Communications Networking Sector »
- Sycamore Networks, Inc. F4Q08 (Qtr End 07/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth »
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap »
- Numerex Corporation at Singular Research's Annual "Best of the Uncovereds" Conference Presentation »
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Hedge Funds Are Getting Their Butts Kicked Too
- Energy Independence: It's About Demand, Not Supply
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- McCainomics: What Can He Do?
- ETF Insights: The New Hard Assets Producers ETF
- Why Airline Stocks Are So Often Bad Investments
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings »
- Five Reasons Steve Ballmer Thinks Apple's a Buy »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- What's in Store for the Fertilizer Industry? »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Apple to Reveal Mysterious Product Transition on September 9th »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Oil: The Inconvenient Truth »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Unconvention Energy Still Attractive - UBS
- Red Hat / Qumranet Deal Adds Fuel to the Virtualization Fire
- ETF Pick of the Week: iShares MSCI Netherlands
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- China Natural Gas: Growth Appears Certain
- Can TRW Automotive Escape the Michigan Mess?
- Things Aren't Good - Fast Money Recap (9/4/08)
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 5 comments:
George
This is the ground floor of a dramatically improved technology in high need & future high demand.
IMHO
Merry Christmas
What is going to happen if all these new shareholders start cascading their liquidity into the market! You can't tell me they are not going to sell- otherwise why would they agree to the swap! What sort of lockup agreements are in place?
This is a meaningless event unless you examine the cost of issuing new shares and compare that against your expected performance of the company.
What am I missing here?
George
You are missing and overlooking the fact that the process has a precedent. In 2002 with Apex partners and again in 2005 with IBM,Tamar VCs & others, none of which produced any marked impact on the trading values of LNOP. These VCs are funding with a 10 to 1 appreciation expectation.
You also need to know that there are selling restriction in place. As I understand it to be true, 1/3 cannot be sold for 180 days; 1/3 cannot be sold for 90 days; the remainder may be sold at will.
All these investors are pretty savy traders in their own right, If they had little or no confidence in the future of EZchip, would they be where they are?
George
The train may have left the station but it is now only at the 1st stop of a long ride to come. IMHO!
I have a long position.
George
Sooner or later the market will awaken to this issue.